Most organizations are always confronted with the challenges of knowing which agile framework works best for them. No doubt, Agile is a set of ideas and principles, Kanban and Scrum are frameworks built on the principles of agile and can describe how you and your team will collaborate, communicate and get the tasks completed.
Agile Kanban vs. Scrum
Kanban and Scrum are the most famous agile frameworks that have been used by many organizations globally. Kanban involves the continuous development and delivery; it usually tackles a small number of tasks at the same time. Kanban teams make use of the visual planning tool called the Kanban board. The Kanban normally showcases each project on a card and then moves the cards through columns that depict the progressive stages of completion.
Scrum on its own will split the complex tasks into user stories and have them visualized on a workflow. Scrum teams are committed to shipping working application at the end of the set intervals. In comparing Kanban vs. Scrum, Kanban suits the teams that are involved in a continuous stream of work requests while Scrum fits the teams that are required to deliver value to their customers on a consistent basis.
In terms of cadence, Scrum has regularly fixed-length sprints while Kanban is a continuous flow. In terms of roles, Daily Scrum involves product owner, Scrum master, and development team while Kanban has no existing roles but the assistance of an agile coach can be required. In terms of key metrics, Scrum uses velocity while Kanban uses cycle time.
Sinnaps, software project management, it is one of the best web-based task boards that allow teams to work together in real time, leading to tremendous and spectacular improvements in productivity in line with the Scrum methodology. Also, it allows the use of an Agile Scrum Kanban board in an intuitive and easy-to-use manner for project management and helps you communicate and represent information conveniently.
Agile vs. Scrum
Both Agile and Scrum follow the same system. However, there are some notable differences when comparing Agile vs. Scrum, Agile will describe the set of principles in the agile model for application development through the iterative development while Scrum involves the use of specific set rules to practice in application development. Agile is the philosophy while Scrum is the procedure to implement the agile philosophy.
Lean vs. Agile
Lean project management is disposed to eliminating and reducing wastes. Lean development uses the principles from lean manufacturing and put them to use in application development. The principles of lean development are also similar to agile principles but lean takes the principles to another level. There are different phases in lean development, you are required to select, plan, develop, test, and deploy one feature before you repeat the process for the next feature.
Kanban vs. Agile
Kanban is the visual way of agile principle; however, there are some distinct differences between them. Kanban encourages the continuous flow while Agile works in iteration. Also, Kanban is suited to any type of work while Agile suits some projects. Kanban involves a visual representation of the workflow while Agile does not.
Both Kanban and Agile have similarities such as; both are capable of breaking down projects into smaller lumps. Also, both lay emphasis on continuous improvement and place a high premium on transparency.
Scrum vs. Waterfall
When comparing Scrum with waterfall, waterfall is very effective for projects completed in a linear style and does not encourage reversing to a prior stage while Scrum is disposed to getting more tasks done swiftly. Sinnaps as a tool can be used by both Scrum and waterfall project management teams to carry out their project.
Create dependences between activities
In comparing Agile vs. Waterfall vs. Scrum, these procedures have some prominent differences but each one of them is useful in the facilitation of the project completion. Each can be used by teams in managing work processes through proper structure and communication.
In waterfall project management, it uses distinct phases rather than simultaneous work processes; a stage precedes another one, and each stage is required to be completed before the commencement of the next stage. Agile on its own relates to the procedure that includes both Scrum and Kanban.
While comparing with waterfall project management, Agile lays emphasis on the adaptive and simultaneous workflows. Agile procedure work incrementally; this makes it possible for teams to adjust their processes with some frequency while Waterfall makes use of set and inflexible process.
Scrum vs. XP
When it comes to Scrum vs. XP, Scrum teams usually work in iterations that are in the range of 2 weeks to one month long while Extreme programming (XP) teams work in iterations that are one or two weeks long. Again, Scrum teams do not allow changes into their sprints while XP teams are capable of making changes to their sprint retrospective.
Furthermore, Extreme programming (XP) teams work in strict priority order while Scrum teams work in features that are prioritized by the product owner. Also, XP can be used in prescribing engineering practices while Scrum cannot. Sinnaps can be used by XP teams for the simulations of various engineering processes.
Lean vs. Scrum vs. Kanban
Again, comparing Lean vs. Scrum vs. Kanban. The three of them are effective for project completion. Lean strives to reduce waste and maximize value to the customers. In lean, waste could amount to building the wrong feature. Lean is less prescriptive in the delivery of time-boxes and can be readily deployed by the team at any time while Kanban focuses on the production plans driven by the actual consumption. It also lays emphasis on waste by refraining from surplus production.
The principles of Kanban are based on the reduction of multitasking, decrease waste, and the ability to meet the needs of the customers. On its own, Scrum is centered on the commitment to the goal in the sprint; doing what is right, maintain the focus on the work items in the current sprint, being open about the challenges involved and the mutual respect for every member of the team.
Agile vs. Scrum vs. Kanban
On Agile vs. Scrum vs. Kanban comparison, there is a need to know that Agile is the project management procedures that break down large complex projects into smaller manageable lumps. However, both Scrum and Kanban are 2 agile project management procedures with differences though they share some similarities.
Scrum procedure breaks down the development cycle time-limited work periods called sprint which can last for 2 weeks. Scrum has a minimum of 3 prescribed roles which are the product owner, the Scrum Master, and Team members. Kanban is less structured and is based on the backlog items to do.
Again, Kanban does not have a specified timeframe for when the backlog items will be done. The procedure of Kanban is managed based on the priority of items on the Kanban boards.
SAFe vs. Scrum
In comparing SAFe vs. Scrum, SAFe is Scalable Agile Framework which defines the approach for scaling Scrum to make it work for bigger enterprises with a much bigger team working on the same product. Both Scrum and SAFe are agile procedures; however, Scrum can be difficult in scaling into the larger and complex project that requires multiple teams.
Scrum can only be used by small teams while SAFe fits the use of bigger teams. Scrum’s middle management has no role while SAFe deals with program and portfolio management. In comparing Kanban vs. Sprint, Kanban is a visual system for managing work, it will visualize both the process and the actual work that take place in the process while sprint is iteration in Scrum, and it is one development cycle in Scrum project management.
Dsdm vs. Scrum and DevOps vs. Scrum
While comparing dsdm vs. Scrum, dynamic systems development method (dsdm) and Scrum are based on agile principles and ideas, dsdm is a scalable agile project and solution delivery. It is suitable for the use of small and large complex corporate teams, unlike Scrum that is suitable for the use of small teams. Also, dsdm is effective in other sectors like the non-IT solution, unlike Scrum.
While comparing DevOps vs. Scrum, DevOps is an application development method that focuses on communication, integration, and collaboration among IT professionals to ensure rapid deployment of products. DevOps endeavors to meet deadlines and benchmark with major releases, the major goal is to deliver code for daily production or every few hours while Scrum is managed in sprints which can take a longer period of time of about 1 or 2 weeks.
When it comes to feedback, DevOps’ feedback is from the internal team while feedback is given by the customer in Scrum. Scrum is centered on applications development while DevOps focuses on an end-to-end business solution and swift delivery.
Rup vs. Scrum
Furthermore, on Rup vs. Scrum, rational unified process (RUP) and Scrum adhere to the agile framework. However, RUP involves more definition of scope, major milestones, and specific dares while Scrum makes use of a project backlog instead of a scope. Also, in Scrum, the whole team is accountable but RUP usually prescribes a high number of roles. In RUP, the requirements are specified as Use Cases while Scrum uses User stories.
Furthermore, PMBOK is the project management body of knowledge; it is a project management guide. In comparing PMBOK vs. Scrum, PMBOK is rigid and there is a little room for flexibility while Scrum is an agile framework that can address complex adaptive problems and delivering products with outstanding value in a creative and productive manner.
Also, it is a general framework that can be applied to any type of project, though it is not prescriptive of any specific method, it is suitable for use in application development. PMBOK is not a method while Scrum is a dynamic method suited for use in IT.
Sinnaps, the best Agile Kanban and Scrum tool
Sinnaps is a project management tool that can be used effectively and efficiently for Scrum and Kanban methodologies, its ease of use makes it ideal for the use of the Scrum teams in planning their sprint. It supports the three principles of Kanban which are visualization, limiting works-in-progress by avoiding unnecessary bottlenecks, and it enhances workflow through effective prioritization of tasks.
It can be used in communicating and sharing vital information among the stakeholders of a project. It is cloud-based which makes it to reliable for saving the plans of the teams.